Talk:HMS Bridgewater (L01)

HMS Bridgewater (L01) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 11, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Bridgewater (L01)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 00:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well constructed, will get back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Section 1

Para 3; Please reconsider the uses of comma(,)s in the first sentence. Presently, it reads "... shipyard on 6 February 1928 and was launched, without ceremony, on 14 September 1928" I advice ... shipyard on 6 February 1928, and was launched without ceremony on 14 September 1928, because omitting them doesn't change the meaning and moreover many of them makes the reader confused.
Para 4; In the latter of the last sentence, please consider adding "was" before "increased". So it reads .....the depth charge outfit was increased to 15 charges.

Section 2

Para 2; The sentence "Bridgewater had her second high-angle, four-inch gun installed during a refit there that was interrupted by the Munich Crisis of September 1938 when she was ordered to Freetown, Sierra Leone" is a bit confusing. As far I know, "high-angle four-inch gun" is a single one, then what is the need of using a comma, and consider adding a comma after there (..ing a refit there, that was inter..)

All good, and well written. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC) @Sturmvogel 66: Please address the issues. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:37, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for my tardiness in responding to your comments. They were good ones, although I broke the sentence in your second point in half to improve readability. See how it reads now.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 01:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]